Software and System Modeling Review Form Please email completed review to the editor assigned to the paper and send a copy to review@sosym.org Editor: Please Enter Your Full Name: __________________________________________ General Information Paper Number: _________________ Title: ________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Section I. Overview 1. Which category describes this submission? ___Practice/Case Study/Experience Report ___Technology/Tool ___Research ___Survey ___Other 2. Please rate the submission. ___Excellent ___Good ___Fair ___Poor ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Section II. Recommendation Please make your recommendation. ___Accept with no changes ___Accept if certain minor revisions are made ___Resubmit with major revisions* ___Reject * Resubmitted papers must be accompanied by a letter from the author indicating how the concerns stated by the reviewers have been addressed in the resubmission. Reasons for not addressing a concern must be stated in the letter. The resubmitted papers will be reviewed by a majority of the original reviewers if possible, with respect to the concerns raised in the original reviews. Authors have up to 3 months to resubmit a major revision of their papers. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Section III. Detailed Comments A. Public Comments (these will be made available to the author) Please address the following questions/concerns in your review: 1. Are the title, abstract, and keywords appropriate? 2. Does the introduction state the objectives of the submission in terms that encourage the reader to read on? 3. How relevant is this submission to the readers of this journal? The target audience of the journal are practitioners and researchers from industry and academia with a vested interest in high quality modeling practices and research. Indicate the extent that the paper will be relevant to this target audience. 4. How does this submission advance the field of software and system modeling research and practice? Comment on any novel contributions or significant insights gained. The journal aims to publish papers that deepen understanding of modeling practices and techniques or contribute significant new ideas that revolutionize or incrementally advance the field. 5. Is the submission technically sound? For example, comment on (1) adherence to standards if standard notations/techniques/methods are used, (2) soundness of mathematical expressions, and (3) soundness of conclusions drawn from objective premises. 6. Does the submission contain sufficient and most appropriate references? Journal versions of work are preferred over conference versions. Indicate important missing references, if any. 7. Comment on the organization of the submission. Is it focused? Is the length appropriate for the topic? 8. Please comment on the readability of this submission. Please comment on the degree of effort required to read and understand this paper. _______________________________________________________________________ B. Confidential Comments (authors will not see these comments) _______________________________________________________________________